Qualitative Findings From a Survey on Patient Experiences and Satisfaction with Lung Cancer Screening

BackgroundTo reveal successes and potential limitations of the lung cancer screening program, we conducted a survey that included both quantitative and open-ended questions to measure patient experiences and satisfaction with screening.MethodsWe report on the five open-ended items related to barriers to returning for screening, experience with other cancer prevention screenings, positive and negative experiences, and suggestions for improving future appointments. The open-ended responses were analyzed using constant comparison method and inductive content analysis.ResultsRespondents (182 patients, 86% response rate for open-ended questions) provided generally positive comments about their lung cancer screening experience. Negative comments were related to desire for more information about results, long wait times for results, and billing issues. Suggestions for improvements included: scheduling on-line appointments and text or email reminders, lower costs, and responding to uncertainty about eligibility criteria.ConclusionFindings provide insights about patient experiences and satisfaction with lung cancer screening which is important given low uptake. Ongoing patient-centered feedback may improve the lung cancer screening experience and increase follow-up screening rates.

Automated summary

In order to evaluate the lung cancer screening program, a survey was conducted to measure patient experiences and satisfaction. Results showed that patients generally had positive comments, but also expressed concerns about the lack of information, long wait times, and billing issues. Suggestions for improvement included online appointments, reminders, lower costs, and clarification of eligibility criteria.