4.6 Article

Can youth-engaged research facilitate equitable access to contraception in Canada? The qualitative study protocol for the Ask Us project

期刊

BMJ OPEN
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070904

关键词

Health policy; GYNAECOLOGY; Community child health; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to identify the barriers that youth face when accessing contraception in Canada, from the perspectives of both youth and youth service providers. It will use a prospective, mixed-methods, integrated knowledge mobilisation approach, involving in-depth interviews with youth and service providers. The study will also focus on co-creating and evaluating knowledge translation products with youth, service providers, and policy makers.
IntroductionThere is little to no evidence in Canada on the barriers that youth face when accessing contraception. We seek to identify the contraception access, experiences, beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, and needs of youth in Canada, from the perspectives of youth and youth service providers.Methods and analysisThis prospective, mixed-methods, integrated knowledge mobilisation study, the Ask Us project, will involve a national sample of youth, healthcare and social service providers, and policy makers recruited via a novel relational mapping and outreach approach led by youth. Phase I will centre the voices of youth and their service providers through in-depth one-on-one interviews. We will explore the factors influencing youth access to contraception, theoretically guided by Levesque's Access to Care framework. Phase II will focus on the cocreation and evaluation of knowledge translation products (youth stories) with youth, service providers, and policy makers.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval was received from the University of British Columbia's Research Ethics Board (H21-01091). Full open-access publication of the work will be sought in an international peer-reviewed journal. Findings will be disseminated to youth and service providers through social media, newsletters, and communities of practice, and to policy makers through invited evidence briefs and face-to-face presentations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据