3.8 Article

Pork Quality Traits According to Postmortem pH and Temperature in Berkshire

出版社

KOREAN SOC FOOD SCIENCE ANIMAL RESOURCES
DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2016.36.1.29

关键词

meat quality trait; Berkshire; pH(45min); pH(24h); pH change; temperature change

资金

  1. Priority Research Centers Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [2009-0093813]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study was performed to investigate the role of pH and temperature postmortem, and to demonstrate the importance of these factors in determining meat quality. Postmortem pH(45min) (pH at 45 min postmortem or initial pH) via analysis of Pearson's correlation showed high positive correlation with pH change pH(c24) (pH change from pH(45min) to pH(24h) postmortem). However, postmortem pH after 24 h (pH(24h) or ultimate pH) had a high negative correlation with pH change, pH(c24) CIE L*, and protein content. Initial temperature postmortem (T-1h,) was positively associated with a change in temperature from 45 min to 24 h postmortem (T-c24) and cooking loss, but negatively correlated with water holding capacity. Temperature at 24 h postmortem (T-24h) was negatively associated with T-c24. Collectively, these results indicate that higher initial pH was associated with higher pH(c24), T-1h and T-c24. However, higher initial pH was associated with a reduction in carcass weight, backfat thickness, CIE a* and b*, water holding capacity, collagen and fat content, drip loss, and cooking loss as well as decreased shear force. In contrast, CIE a* and b*, drip loss, cooking loss, and shear force in higher ultimate pH was showed by a similar pattern to higher initial pH, whereas pH(c24), carcass weight, backfat thickness, water holding capacity, fat content, moisture content, protein content, T-1h,T-24h and T-c24 were exhibited by completely differential patterns (p<0.05). Therefore, we suggest that initial pH, ultimate pH, and temperatures postmortem are important factors in determining the meat quality of pork.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据