4.5 Article

Risk factors associated with Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in non-HIV immunocompromised patients and co-pathogens analysis by metagenomic next-generation sequencing

期刊

BMC PULMONARY MEDICINE
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12890-022-02300-8

关键词

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP); Immunocompromised patients; Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS); Risk factors; Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The accurate prediction of the development of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) in non-HIV immunocompromised patients is still unclear. Concomitant use of corticosteroids and immunosuppressant and lymphocyte counts < 0.7 x 10(9)/L are risk factors for the development of PJP in non-HIV immunocompromised patients. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) reveals that mixed infections, including CMV, EBV, and Candida, are common in PJP patients.
BackgroundPneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) is one of the most common opportunistic infections in immunocompromised patients. However, the accurate prediction of the development of PJP in non-HIV immunocompromised patients is still unclear.MethodsNon-HIV immunocompromised patients confirmed diagnosis of PJP by the clinical symptoms, chest computed tomography and etiological results of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) were enrolled as observation group. Another group of matched non-HIV immunocompromised patients with non-PJP pneumonia were enrolled to control group. The risk factors for the development of PJP and the co-pathogens in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) detected by mNGS were analyzed. ResultsA total of 67 (33 PJP, 34 non-PJP) participants were enrolled from Fujian Provincial Hospital. The ages, males and underlying illnesses were not significantly different between the two groups. Compared to non-PJP patients, PJP patients were more tends to have the symptoms of fever and dyspnea. The LYM and ALB were significantly lower in PJP patients than in non-PJP patients. Conversely, LDH and serum BDG in PJP patients were significantly higher than in non-PJP controls. For immunological indicators, the levels of immunoglobulin A, G, M and complement C3, C4, the numbers of T, B, and NK cells, had no statistical difference between these two groups. Logistic multivariate analysis showed that concomitant use of corticosteroids and immunosuppressant (OR 14.146, P = 0.004) and the lymphocyte counts < 0.7 x 10(9)/L (OR 6.882, P = 0.011) were risk factors for the development of PJP in non-HIV immunocompromised patients. 81.82% (27/33) and 64.71% (22/34) mixed infections were identified by mNGS in the PJP group and non-PJP group separately. CMV, EBV and Candida were the leading co-pathogens in PJP patients. The percentages of CMV and EBV identified by mNGS in PJP group were significantly higher than those in the control group(p < 0.005). ConclusionsClinicians should pay close attention to the development of PJP in non-HIV immunocompromised patients who possess the risk factors of concomitant use of corticosteroids and immunosuppressant and the lymphocyte counts < 0.7 x 10(9)/L. Prophylaxis for PJP cannot rely solely on CD4(+) T counts in non-HIV immunocompromised patients. Whether CMV infection increases the risk of PJP remains to be further investigated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据