4.4 Article

Effect of rotation rate on the recovery of Nd-Fe-B sludge via rotation-reduction diffusion method

期刊

AIP ADVANCES
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/9.0000379

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rotation calcium thermal reduction diffusion technology was used to regenerate Nd-Fe-B sludge, resulting in uniform and well-dispersed regenerated Nd-Fe-B powder. The magnetic properties of the regenerated powder initially increased and then decreased with increasing rotation rate. When the rotation rate was 10 rpm, the magnetization of the regenerated powder reached 138.22 emu/g, 10.2% higher than that of the purified sludge. The regenerated powder was further processed to prepare a sintered magnet with a density of 7.51 g/cm(3) and a maximum magnetic energy product of 42.87 MGOe, laying a foundation for in situ regeneration of Nd-Fe-B sludge.
In recent years, calcium reduction diffusion has emerged as a new method for in situ regeneration of Nd-Fe-B sludge. In this work, rotation calcium thermal reduction diffusion technology was used for the first time to solve the issue of batch regeneration of Nd-Fe-B sludge to a certain extent, and regenerated Nd-Fe-B powder with uniform size and good dispensability was prepared. The effect of rotation rate on the properties of regenerated Nd-Fe-B powder was mainly studied. We found that the magnetic properties of the regenerated magnetic powder initially increased and then decreased with increasing rotation rate. When the rotation rate was 10 rpm, the magnetization of regenerated magnetic powder reached 138.22 emu/g, which was 10.2% higher than that of the purified sludge. The regenerated magnetic powder was doped with rare earth-rich alloy powder and high remanence alloy powder to control the composition, where the regenerated sintered magnet was prepared. The density reached 7.51 g/cm(3) and the maximum magnetic energy product reached 42.87 MGOe, laying a foundation for the short-process in situ regeneration of Nd-Fe-B sludge.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据