4.7 Article

Approaches to group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations based on multiplicative consistency

期刊

KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS
卷 97, 期 -, 页码 48-59

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2016.01.017

关键词

Group decision making; Intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation; Order consistency; Multiplicative consistency; Weak transitivity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71271071, 71371011, 71301041, 71490725, 91546108]
  2. National 863 Key Project on Cloud Manufacturing [2015AA042101]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation (IFPR) was introduced by Xu to efficiently deal with situations in which the decision makers (DMs) exhibit the characteristics of affirmation, negation and hesitation for the preference degrees over paired comparisons of alternatives. In this paper, two new approaches to group decision making (GDM) are proposed to derive the normalized intuitionistic fuzzy priority weights from IFPRs based on the order consistency and the multiplicative consistency. First, the concepts of order consistency and weak transitivity for IFPRs are introduced, and followed by a discussion of their desirable properties. Then, in order to convert the normalized intuitionistic fuzzy priority weights into multiplicative consistent IFPR, a transformation approach is investigated. Two linear optimization models are further developed to derive the normalized intuitionistic fuzzy weight vector for both individual and group IFPRs with the principle of minimizing the deviations between any provided IFPR and the converted multiplicative consistent IFPR, and the optimal deviation values obtained from the models enable us to improve the multiplicative consistency of IFPRs. Finally, based on the order consistency and the multiplicative consistency, two new algorithms for GDM are presented. Several numerical examples are provided, and comparative analyses with existing approaches are performed to demonstrate that the proposed methods are both valid and practical to deal with group decision making problems. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据