4.7 Article

Feature subset selection based on fuzzy neighborhood rough sets

期刊

KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS
卷 111, 期 -, 页码 173-179

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2016.08.009

关键词

Fuzzy neighborhood; Fuzzy decision; Feature selection; Rough set model

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61572082, 61473111, 61363056]
  2. Program for Liaoning Excellent Talents in University [LR2012039]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province [2014020142]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rough set theory has been extensively discussed in machine learning and pattern recognition. It provides us another important theoretical tool for feature selection. In this paper, we construct a novel rough set model for feature subset selection. First, we define the fuzzy decision of a sample by using the concept of fuzzy neighborhood. A parameterized fuzzy relation is introduced to characterize fuzzy information granules for analysis of real-valued data. Then, we use the relationship between fuzzy neighborhood and fuzzy decision to construct a new rough set model: fuzzy neighborhood rough set model. Based on this model, the definitions of upper and lower approximation, boundary region and positive region are given, and the effects of parameters on these concepts are discussed. To make the new model tolerate noises in data, we introduce a variable-precision fuzzy neighborhood rough set model. This model can decrease the possibility that a sample is classified into a wrong category. Finally, we define the dependency between fuzzy decision and condition attributes and employ the dependency to evaluate the significance of a candidate feature, using which a greedy feature subset selection algorithm is designed. The proposed algorithm is compared with some classical algorithms. The experiments show that the proposed algorithm gets higher classification performance and the numbers of selected features are relatively small. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据