4.7 Article

Multi-label learning with label-specific feature reduction

期刊

KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS
卷 104, 期 -, 页码 52-61

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2016.04.012

关键词

Feature reduction; Fuzzy rough set; Label-specific feature; Multi-label learning; Sample selection

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61572242, 61305058, 61373062, 61503160, 61502211]
  2. Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [61233011]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China [BK20130471]
  4. Open Project Foundation of Intelligent Information Processing Key Laboratory of Shanxi Province [2014002]
  5. Key Laboratory of Oceanographic Big Data Mining & Application of Zhejiang Province [OBDMA201501]
  6. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [2014M550293]
  7. Qing Lan Project of Jiangsu Province of China, Postgraduate Research Innovation Foundation of Jiangsu University of Science and Technology [YCX15S-10]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In multi-label learning, since different labels may have some distinct characteristics of their own, multi label learning approach with label-specific features named LIFT has been proposed. However, the construction of label-specific features may encounter the increasing of feature dimensionalities and a large amount of redundant information exists in feature space. To alleviate this problem, a multi-label learning approach FRS-LIFT is proposed, which can implement label-specific feature reduction with fuzzy rough set. Furthermore, with the idea of sample selection, another multi-label learning approach FRS-SS-LIFT is also presented, which effectively reduces the computational complexity in label-specific feature reduction. Experimental results on 10 real-world multi-label data sets show that, our methods can not only reduce the dimensionality of label-specific features when compared with LIFT, but also achieve satisfactory performance among some popular multi-label learning approaches. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据