4.5 Review

Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Discectomy versus Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

相关参考文献

注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。
Review Clinical Neurology

A Review of Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Decompression for Radiculopathy

Daniel Franco et al.

Summary: This manuscript provides a succinct review of the origins and latest advancements in endoscopic spine surgery, serving as a reference for physicians interested in learning this approach. The indications for endoscopic decompression have expanded, and the use of minimally invasive options offers significant advantages for patient outcomes and recovery. However, there are limitations to this technique, and it should not be used as a blanket approach for nerve root decompression. As these techniques become more widely accepted, we expect the reach and indications of endoscopic spine surgery to continue to broaden and diversify, especially with the integration of navigation technologies.

CURRENT PAIN AND HEADACHE REPORTS (2022)

Article Orthopedics

Unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy versus percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study

Hao-Wei Jiang et al.

Summary: Comparing the clinical outcomes between UBE and PELD for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation, both methods yield similar results in pain control and patient satisfaction. However, UBE is associated with more disadvantages compared to PELD, including increased blood loss, longer operation time, longer hospital stay, and higher total hospitalization costs.

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH (2022)

Article Anesthesiology

Clinical comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy with percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for single l4/5-level lumbar disk herniation

Jie Hao et al.

Summary: The study compared outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy (UBE) and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) for single L4/5-level lumbar disk herniation. PELD group showed less intraoperative blood loss, shorter operative time, and shorter hospital stay compared to UBE group. Both groups had significant reduction in VAS and ODI scores postoperatively, with PELD group showing better pain relief.

PAIN PRACTICE (2022)

Review Surgery

Comparison of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy and open lumbar discectomy for lumbar disc herniations: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Jian Zhang et al.

Summary: This study compared the outcomes of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) and open lumbar discectomy (OLD) for lumbar disc herniation (LDH). The results showed that PTED achieved better outcomes in terms of complication rates, length of incision, and length of hospital stay compared with OLD.

FRONTIERS IN SURGERY (2022)

Article Clinical Neurology

Learning Curve and Complications of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy : Cumulative Sum and Risk-Adjusted Cumulative Sum Analysis

Jinchao Xu et al.

Summary: This study investigated the learning curve and complications of unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) in 197 patients. The results showed that UBE surgery is effective with low incidence of complications, but mastering the technique requires a learning curve of at least 54 cases.

NEUROSPINE (2022)

Article Cell Biology

Clinical Analysis of Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Treatment of Severe Lumbar Disc Herniation with UBE Two-Channel Endoscopy and Foraminal Single-Channel Endoscopy Technique

Cuihua Yuan et al.

Summary: This study compared the outcomes of foraminal single-channel endoscopy and unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) in the treatment of severe lumbar disc herniation. The results showed that the UBE group had significantly lower rates of postoperative residual nucleus pulposus and recurrence compared to the single-channel endoscopy group. Additionally, the incidence of postoperative anemia was significantly lower in the interforaminal endoscopic group than in the UBE group.

OXIDATIVE MEDICINE AND CELLULAR LONGEVITY (2022)

Article Surgery

The clinical efficacy of biportal endoscopy is comparable to that of uniportal endoscopy via the interlaminar approach for the treatment of L5/S1 lumbar disc herniation

Rujun Zuo et al.

Summary: This study compared the clinical outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopy/biportal endoscopic spinal surgery (UBE/BESS) via the posterior approach with those of interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD) for the treatment of L5/S1 lumbar disc herniation. The results showed that the clinical efficacy of UBE/BESS was comparable to that of IELD. However, UBE/BESS had a longer surgical incision length and greater surgical trauma compared to IELD.

FRONTIERS IN SURGERY (2022)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy versus percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Xu Ma et al.

Summary: This study compared the efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy (UBE) and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. The results showed that PELD had advantages in operation time and intraoperative hemorrhage, while there was no significant difference in clinical efficacy between the two methods.

MEDICINE (2022)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Korean Medicine Clinical Practice Guidelines for Lumbar Herniated Intervertebral Disc in Adults: Based on Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE)

Bonhyuk Goo et al.

Summary: The study updated the Korean medicine clinical practice guidelines for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation, demonstrating the effectiveness of Korean medicine interventions in the treatment of disc herniation. The development of the Korean medicine clinical guidelines involved expert consensus and the Delphi method.

HEALTHCARE (2022)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews

Matthew J. Page et al.

Summary: The methods and results of systematic reviews should be reported in sufficient detail to allow users to assess trustworthiness. PRISMA 2020 aims to improve the transparency and completeness of systematic review reporting, in hopes of guiding more accurate and transparent reporting.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2021)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

Matthew J. Page et al.

Summary: The PRISMA statement was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report the purpose, methods, and findings of their reviews. The updated PRISMA 2020 statement includes new reporting guidance, a 27-item checklist, an abstract checklist, and revised flow diagrams for reviews.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2021)

Review Orthopedics

Current concepts for lumbar disc herniation

Thami Benzakour et al.

INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS (2019)

Article Clinical Neurology

Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression for Lumbar Disk Herniation and Spinal Canal Stenosis: A Technical Note

Sang Soo Eun et al.

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART A-CENTRAL EUROPEAN NEUROSURGERY (2017)

Article Mathematical & Computational Biology

Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis

JPT Higgins et al.

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2002)