4.7 Article

Lifestyle factors and clinical severity of Parkinson's disease

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-31531-w

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using generalized linear models, this study found that coffee drinking was associated with reduced swallowing problems, while the dosage and duration of coffee intake were not related to motor or non-motor symptoms. Aspirin intake correlated with increased tremor, problems getting up, light-headedness, and problems remembering. Smoking directly correlated with symptoms such as drooling, swallowing difficulties, and freezing, as well as potentially mood-related symptoms like unexplained pains, memory problems, and feeling sad. Confirmatory and longitudinal studies are needed to further investigate these clinical correlations over time.
Genetic factors, environmental factors, and gene-environment interactions have been found to modify PD risk, age at onset (AAO), and disease progression. The objective of this study was to explore the association of coffee drinking, aspirin intake, and smoking, with motor and non-motor symptoms in a cohort of 35,959 American patients with PD from the Fox Insight Study using generalized linear models. Coffee drinkers had fewer problems swallowing but dosage and duration of coffee intake were not associated with motor or non-motor symptoms. Aspirin intake correlated with more tremor (p = 0.0026), problems getting up (p = 0.0185), light-headedness (p = 0.0043), and problems remembering (p = 1 x 10(-5)). Smoking was directly associated with symptoms: smokers had more problems with drooling (p = 0.0106), swallowing (p = 0.0002), and freezing (p < 1 x 10(-5)). Additionally, smokers had more possibly mood-related symptoms: unexplained pains (p < 1 x 10(-5)), problems remembering (p = 0.0001), and feeling sad (p < 1 x 10(-5)). Confirmatory and longitudinal studies are warranted to investigate the clinical correlation over time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据