4.7 Article

Exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months after assisted and spontaneous conceiving: a prospective study in Northern Italy

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-33688-w

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of assisted infertility treatments on breastfeeding duration was evaluated. Mothers who conceived using assisted treatment and those who conceived naturally were compared in terms of breastfeeding exclusivity at 6 months. The study found no significant difference between the two groups.
Conceiving by assisted infertility treatments may influence breastfeeding duration. In one-year time, to evaluate the goal of 6 months breastfeeding, we recruited 55 consecutive mothers who conceived using assisted treatment compared to 45 mothers conceiving naturally, all giving birth to healthy, full-term, singleton infants, sharing the double-occupancy room. At birth, maternal/neonatal characteristics were obtained by medical records and interviews. Six months after, a telephonic interview was done about the exclusivity of breastfeeding, mood instability, and breastfeeding complications. All the women were supported by the same neonatal-pediatrician team, during the study period. The number of mothers who were exclusively breastfeeding at six months was not statistically different between the two groups, as well as, breastfeeding initiation, BMI, smoking habit, mood instability, co-morbidities. In the assisted group, the women were older, had fewer previous children, upper degree of education, higher rate of cesarean sections, their neonate's birthweight was lower; they reported more breastfeeding complications, but the distribution was not different between groups. The control women had higher number of previously breastfed siblings. Our experience highlights that the mode of conception may not be the defining factor influencing the goal of 6 months lactation. The support of healthcare professional team has a crucial role in maintaining breastfeeding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据