4.7 Article

Usefulness of two-dimensional shear wave elastography in the assessment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in children and adolescents

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-37281-z

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the role of two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) in the diagnosis and severity assessment of paediatric non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The results showed that 2D-SWE can be used as a non-invasive diagnostic tool for diagnosing and assessing the severity of paediatric NAFLD.
Two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) evaluates liver stiffness using a non-invasive method, but studies in the paediatric population are rare. This study evaluated the role of 2D-SWE in the diagnosis and severity of paediatric non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). In total, 131 patients with NAFLD and 25 healthy controls were enrolled in this study. The diagnosis and severity of NAFLD were initially assessed using the ultrasound fatty liver index (US-FLI), and all participants underwent 2D-SWE. US-FLI semi-quantitatively measures the severity of NAFLD on a scale of 2-8. The assessment of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by 2D-SWE is presented in kilopascals (kPa). The NAFLD group was characterised by significantly higher LSM (4.40 & PLUSMN; 0.90 kPa) than the control group (3.76 & PLUSMN; 0.28 kPa) (P < 0.001). 2D-SWE significantly correlated with age, height, weight, body mass index, glucose, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, US-FLI, and triglyceride-glucose index (P < 0.001). In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the area under the curve of LSM for predicting US-FLI & GE; 2 and & GE; 6 was 0.784 (P < 0.001) and 0.819 (P < 0.001), respectively. In conclusion, we suggest that 2D-SWE can be used as a non-invasive diagnostic tool for diagnosing and assessing the severity of paediatric NAFLD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据