4.7 Article

The retinal neurovascular coupling is impaired in men with vasculogenic erectile dysfunction

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-35339-6

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to investigate the retinal vessels in patients with vasculogenic erectile dysfunction (ED) using dynamic vessel analyzer (DVA). The results showed that patients with vasculogenic ED had lower arterial dilation and decreased reaction amplitude, which were positively correlated with the severity of ED.
The aim of this study was to study the retinal vessels in patients affected by vasculogenic erectile dysfunction (ED), using dynamic vessel analyzer (DVA). Patients with vasculogenic ED and control subjects were prospectively enrolled to undergo a complete urological and ophthalmologic evaluation, including DVA and structural optical coherence tomography (OCT). The main outcome measures were: (1) arterial dilation; (2) arterial constriction; (3) reaction amplitude (the difference between arterial dilation and constriction); and, (4) venous dilation. Thirty-five patients with ED and 30 male controls were included in the analysis. Mean +/- SD age was 52.0 +/- 10.8 years in the ED group and 48.1 +/- 16.3 years in the control group (p=0.317). In the dynamic analysis, the arterial dilation was lower in the ED group (1.88 +/- 1.50%), as compared with the control group (3.70 +/- 1.56%, p<0.0001). Neither arterial constriction nor venous dilation differed between groups. The reaction amplitude was decreased in ED patients (2.40 +/- 2.02%, p=0.023), compared to controls (4.25 +/- 2.20%). In the Pearson correlation analysis, the ED severity, was directly correlated with both reaction amplitude (R=.701, p=0.004) and arterial dilation (R=.529, p=0.042). In conclusion, subjects with vasculogenic ED are featured by a significant dysfunction of the retinal neurovascular coupling, which is inversely correlated with ED severity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据