4.7 Article

Food system actor perspectives on future-proofing European food systems through plant breeding

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-32207-1

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Crop improvement is crucial for sustainable food systems, necessitating the integration of stakeholders' needs and priorities. This study provides a multi-stakeholder perspective on the role of crop improvement in future-proofing the European food system. By engaging various stakeholders and conducting a rapid evidence synthesis, consensus was reached on priorities related to environmental sustainability, alternatives to plant breeding, minimizing trade-offs, and addressing geographical variation. Further research is urgently needed to examine downstream sustainability impacts and identify concrete targets for plant breeding innovation.
Crop improvement is a key innovation area in the pursuit of sustainable food systems. However, realising its potential requires integration of the needs and priorities of all agri-food chain stakeholders. In this study, we provide a multi-stakeholder perspective on the role of crop improvement in future-proofing the European food system. We engaged agri-business, farm- and consumer-level stakeholders, and plant scientists through an online survey and focus groups. Four of each group's top five priorities were shared and related to environmental sustainability goals (water, nitrogen and phosphorus efficiency, and heat stress). Consensus was identified on issues including considering existing alternatives to plant breeding (e.g. management strategies), minimising trade-offs, and addressing geographical variation in needs. We conducted a rapid evidence synthesis on the impacts of priority crop improvement options, highlighting the urgent need for further research examining downstream sustainability impacts to identify concrete targets for plant breeding innovation as a food systems solution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据