4.7 Article

Optimized protocol for MALDI MSI of N-glycans using an on-tissue digestion in fresh frozen tissue sections

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-29560-6

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glycans play diverse roles in biology, and variations in N-glycosylation state within tissues have clinical diagnostic value. A protocol for MALDI MSI of N-glycans from fresh frozen tissue was developed, matching the current standard of FFPE analysis. This protocol significantly improves signal intensity and spatial resolution, enhancing the clinical application of MALDI MSI for N-glycan analysis.
Glycans play an important role in biology with multiple cellular functions ranging from cell signaling, mobility and growth to protein folding and localization. The N-glycosylation state within a tissue has been found to vary greatly between healthy and diseased patients and has proven to have an important clinical diagnostic value. Matrix assisted laser-desorption ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) allows for untargeted analysis of biomolecules, including N-glycans, on a tissue section and provides a spatial context of the analyte. Until now, N-glycans have been predominantly analyzed using MALDI MSI on formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue sections, however this greatly reduces the clinical applicability, as the FFPE embedding process alters the biological environment of the tissue. Here we developed a protocol that allows for MALDI MSI of N-glycans from fresh frozen tissue that matches the current standard of FFPE analysis. By optimizing several steps in the sample preparation, we see orders of magnitude increase in signal intensity. Furthermore, this method limits delocalization of released N-glycans, thus improving the effective spatial resolution of the label-free molecular images. This protocol provides a novel perspective towards clinical application of MALDI MSI and capitalizes on the diagnostic value of N-glycan analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据