4.5 Article

Popliteus impingement after TKA may occur with well-sized prostheses

期刊

KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY
卷 25, 期 6, 页码 1720-1730

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4330-8

关键词

Popliteus tendon; TKA pain; TKA sizing; TKA impingement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To determine the mechanisms and extents of popliteus impingements before and after TKA and to investigate the influence of implant sizing. The hypotheses were that (1) popliteus impingements after TKA may occur at both the tibia and the femur, and (2) even with an apparently well-sized prosthesis, popliteal tracking during knee flexion is modified compared to the preoperative situation. The location of the popliteus in three cadaver knees was measured using computed tomography, before and after implantation of plastic TKA replicas, by injecting the tendon with radiopaque liquid. The pre- and post-operative positions of the popliteus were compared from full extension to deep flexion using normosized, oversized, and undersized implants (one size increments). At the tibia, TKA caused the popliteus to translate posteriorly, mostly in full extension: 4.1 +/- 2 mm for normosized implants, and 15.8 +/- 3 mm with oversized implants, but no translations were observed when using undersized implants. At the femur, TKA caused the popliteus to translate laterally at deeper flexion angles, peaking between 80A degrees and 120A degrees: 2 +/- 0.4 mm for normosized implants and 2.6 +/- 0.5 mm with oversized implants. Three-dimensional analysis revealed prosthetic overhang at the posterosuperior corner of normosized and oversized femoral components (respectively, up to 2.9 mm and 6.6 mm). A well-sized tibial component modifies popliteal tracking, while an undersized tibial component maintains more physiologic patterns. Oversizing shifts the popliteus considerably throughout the full arc of motion. This study suggests that both femoro- and tibio-popliteus impingements could play a role in residual pain and stiffness after TKA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据