4.7 Article

Eco-morphodynamic carbon pumping by the largest rivers in the Neotropics

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-32511-w

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzes the eco-morphodynamic activity of large tropical rivers in South and Central America to quantify the carbon flux from riparian vegetation to inland waters. Satellite data of the largest rivers in the Neotropics from 2000 to 2019 were used, and a highly efficient Carbon Pump mechanism was developed. This mechanism alone accounts for 8.9 million tons/year of carbon mobilization in these tropical rivers. Signatures of fluvial eco-morphological activity providing proxies for carbon mobilization capability are identified, and the impact of river migration on carbon intensity of planned hydroelectric dams in the Neotropics is discussed.
The eco-morphodynamic activity of large tropical rivers in South and Central America is analyzed to quantify the carbon flux from riparian vegetation to inland waters. We carried out a multi-temporal analysis of satellite data for all the largest rivers in the Neotropics (i.e, width > 200 m) in the period 2000-2019, at 30 m spatial resolution. We developed a quantification of a highly efficient Carbon Pump mechanism. River morphodynamics is shown to drive carbon export from the riparian zone and to promote net primary production by an integrated process through floodplain rejuvenation and colonization. This pumping mechanism alone is shown to account for 8.9 million tons/year of carbon mobilization in these tropical rivers. We identify signatures of the fluvial eco-morphological activity that provide proxies for the carbon mobilization capability associated with river activity. We discuss river migration-carbon mobilization nexus and effects on the carbon intensity of planned hydroelectric dams in the Neotropics. We recommend that future carbon-oriented water policies on these rivers include a similar analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据