4.7 Article

CCL2 is required for initiation but not persistence of HIV infection mediated neurocognitive disease in mice

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-33491-7

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite antiretroviral therapy, HIV enters the brain shortly after infection and causes neurocognitive impairment in up to 50% of infected individuals. The role of CCL2 in established NCI has been explored, and it has been found that blocking CCL2 transcription can prevent brain infection and NCI.
HIV enters the brain within days of infection causing neurocognitive impairment (NCI) in up to half of infected people despite suppressive antiretroviral therapy. The virus is believed to enter the brain in infected monocytes through chemotaxis to the major monocyte chemokine, CCL2, but the roles of CCL2 in established NCI are not fully defined. We addressed this question during infection of conventional and CCL2 knockout mice with EcoHIV in which NCI can be verified in behavioral tests. EcoHIV enters mouse brain within 5 days of infection, but NCI develops gradually with established cognitive disease starting 25 days after infection. CCL2 knockout mice infected by intraperitoneal injection of virus failed to develop brain infection and NCI. However, when EcoHIV was directly injected into the brain, CCL2 knockout mice developed NCI. Knockout of CCL2 or its principal receptor, CCR2, slightly reduced macrophage infection in culture. Treatment of mice prior to and during EcoHIV infection with the CCL2 transcriptional inhibitor, bindarit, prevented brain infection and NCI and reduced macrophage infection. In contrast, bindarit treatment of mice 4 weeks after infection affected neither brain virus burden nor NCI. Based on these findings we propose that HIV enters the brain mainly through infected monocytes but that resident brain cells are sufficient to maintain NCI. These findings suggest that NCI therapy must act within the brain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据