4.7 Article

Breakfast Practices in Malaysia, Nutrient Intake and Diet Quality: A Study Based on the Malaysian Food Barometer

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 15, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu15092197

关键词

breakfast consumption; diet quality; Malaysia; nutrient intake; Nutrient Rich Food index 9.3

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study established the patterns of breakfast consumption in Malaysia and assessed its contribution to the overall quality of the diet based on national data. It was found that breakfast in Malaysia is rich in fats, sugars, and sodium, while intakes of fiber and essential nutrients are low. The study highlighted the need for nutrient recommendations based on existing breakfast patterns.
Breakfast is often referred to as the most important meal of the day in shaping diet quality. This study established the patterns of breakfast consumption in Malaysia and assessed its contribution to the overall quality of the diet based on the 24 h recall data from the nationally representative and cross-sectional Malaysian Food Barometer (MFB, second data collection, 2018) to assess breakfast intake among adults (n = 1604). Diet quality was measured using the Nutrient Rich Food index (NRF) 9.3. The nutritional profile of breakfast was compared across tertiles of NRF 9.3. Overall, 89% of Malaysians consume breakfast. Breakfast was found to provide 474 kcal on average. The Malaysian daily diet was found to be rich in fats, saturated fats, total sugars, and sodium, with breakfast making a significant contribution to the daily intakes of these nutrients. Intakes of fiber, potassium, calcium, vitamins C and D, folate, iron, zinc, and magnesium were low. Breakfast was related to the overall diet quality measured by the NRF index. This study revealed that the breakfasts consumed by Malaysian adults were found to be nutritionally unbalanced. This analysis could serve as a basis for nutrient recommendations grounded in existing social and cultural breakfast patterns.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据