4.7 Review

Foundational Nutrition: Implications for Human Health

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 15, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu15132837

关键词

foundational nutrition; human longevity; gut microbiome; diet; synergy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human nutrition is a complex topic that is still not fully understood, resulting in global nutritional problems such as malnutrition or overconsumption. Factors contributing to this problem include limitations in recommended daily allowances and dietary reference intakes, changes in soil quality, and reductions in nutrient density. In this article, a new approach called Foundational Nutrition is proposed, which combines whole food approach, crucial micronutrients, and consideration of gut health to enhance bioavailability and bioactive effects of nutrients.
Human nutrition, and what can be considered ideal nutrition, is a complex, multi-faceted topic which many researchers and practitioners deliberate. While some attest that basic human nutrition is relatively understood, it is undeniable that a global nutritional problem persists. Many countries struggle with malnutrition or caloric deficits, while others encounter difficulties with caloric overconsumption and micronutrient deficiencies. A multitude of factors contribute to this global problem. Limitations to the current scope of the recommended daily allowances (RDAs) and dietary reference intakes (DRIs), changes in soil quality, and reductions in nutrient density are just a few of these factors. In this article, we propose a new, working approach towards human nutrition designated Foundational Nutrition. This nutritional lens combines a whole food approach in conjunction with micronutrients and other nutrients critical for optimal human health with special consideration given to the human gut microbiome and overall gut health. Together, this a synergistic approach which addresses vital components in nutrition that enhances the bioavailability of nutrients and to potentiate a bioactive effect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据