4.7 Review

The Complex Effects of Light on Metabolism in Humans

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 15, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu15061391

关键词

light; metabolism; circadian rhythm; sleep; melatonin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Light is crucial for many life forms and the natural light-dark cycle has been a dominant factor for circadian rhythms throughout human evolution. Artificial light has altered human activity patterns and allowed for extended periods of wakefulness outside of natural day-night cycles. However, increased exposure to light at inappropriate times or a reduced range of light between day and night can have negative effects on human health.
Light is an essential part of many life forms. The natural light-dark cycle has been the dominant stimulus for circadian rhythms throughout human evolution. Artificial light has restructured human activity and provided opportunities to extend the day without reliance on natural day-night cycles. The increase in light exposure at unwanted times or a reduced dynamic range of light between the daytime and nighttime has introduced negative consequences for human health. Light exposure is closely linked to sleep-wake regulation, activity and eating patterns, body temperature, and energy metabolism. Disruptions to these areas due to light are linked to metabolic abnormalities such as an increased risk of obesity and diabetes. Research has revealed that various properties of light influence metabolism. This review will highlight the complex role of light in human physiology, with a specific emphasis on metabolic regulation from the perspective of four main properties of light (intensity, duration, timing of exposure, and wavelength). We also discuss the potential influence of the key circadian hormone melatonin on sleep and metabolic physiology. We explore the relationship between light and metabolism through circadian physiology in various populations to understand the optimal use of light to mitigate short and long-term health consequences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据