4.6 Article

Improving Blood Monocyte Energy Metabolism Enhances Its Ability to Phagocytose Amyloid-β and Prevents Alzheimer's Disease-Type Pathology and Cognitive Deficits

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE BULLETIN
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12264-023-01077-y

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; A beta clearance; Monocyte; Phagocytosis; Energy metabolism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A study found that decreased energy metabolism in blood monocytes is associated with cellular senescence, dysfunctional phagocytosis of amyloid beta (A beta), and the progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Improving energy metabolism rejuvenates monocytes and enhances their ability to phagocytose A beta, leading to reduced A beta deposition and neuroinflammation, and improved cognitive function in AD mice. This study reveals a new mechanism of impaired A beta phagocytosis in monocytes and suggests restoring energy metabolism as a novel therapeutic strategy for AD.
Deficiencies in the clearance of peripheral amyloid beta (A beta) play a crucial role in the progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Previous studies have shown that the ability of blood monocytes to phagocytose A beta is decreased in AD. However, the exact mechanism of A beta clearance dysfunction in AD monocytes remains unclear. In the present study, we found that blood monocytes in AD mice exhibited decreases in energy metabolism, which was accompanied by cellular senescence, a senescence-associated secretory phenotype, and dysfunctional phagocytosis of A beta. Improving energy metabolism rejuvenated monocytes and enhanced their ability to phagocytose A beta in vivo and in vitro. Moreover, enhancing blood monocyte A beta phagocytosis by improving energy metabolism alleviated brain A beta deposition and neuroinflammation and eventually improved cognitive function in AD mice. This study reveals a new mechanism of impaired A beta phagocytosis in monocytes and provides evidence that restoring their energy metabolism may be a novel therapeutic strategy for AD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据