4.8 Article

Universal temperature sensitivity of denitrification nitrogen losses in forest soils

期刊

NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE
卷 13, 期 7, 页码 726-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41558-023-01708-2

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Warming affects forest soil denitrification and nitrogen losses, with temperature enhancing nitrous oxide and dinitrogen but varying by soil. The temperature sensitivities are similar across soils but higher for dinitrogen, suggesting complete denitrification in a warmer climate. This finding of universal temperature sensitivity of gaseous N losses from denitrification will facilitate modeling N losses in response to warming globally.
Warming affects forest soil denitrification and nitrogen losses. The authors show that temperature enhances nitrous oxide and dinitrogen but varies by soil; temperature sensitivities are similar across soils but are higher for dinitrogen, suggesting complete denitrification in a warmer climate. Soil nitrous oxide (N2O) and dinitrogen (N-2) emissions from denitrification are crucial to the nitrogen (N) cycle. However, the temperature sensitivities (Q(10)) of gaseous N losses in forest soils are poorly understood, with implications for prediction of N cycle responses to warming. Here, we quantify temperature sensitivities of denitrification-derived potential N2O and N-2 production. Using soils from 18 forest sites in China along a 4,000 km north-south transect we find that N2O and N-2 production rates increased with temperature, with large variations across soils. In contrast, the Q(10) values for N2O (2.1 & PLUSMN; 0.5) and N-2 (2.6 & PLUSMN; 0.6) were similar across soils. N-2 was more sensitive to temperature than N2O, suggesting that warming could promote complete denitrification. Moreover, the Q(10) for denitrification (2.3 & PLUSMN; 0.5) was comparable to Q(10) for aquatic sediments. This finding of universal temperature sensitivity of gaseous N losses from denitrification will facilitate modelling N losses in response to warming globally.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据