4.6 Article

Insights into the Synthesis Parameters Effects on the Structural, Morphological, and Magnetic Properties of Copper Oxide Nanoparticles

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 16, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma16093426

关键词

CuO nanoparticles; oxalate precursor route; X-ray powder diffraction; TEM and SEM observations; magnetic properties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study focuses on integrating the oxalic conversion route into green chemistry to synthesize copper oxide nanoparticles (CuO-NPs) with controllable structural, morphological, and magnetic properties. Two oxalate-containing precursors and different solvent ratios were tested. The obtained CuO-NPs exhibit oval-shaped morphology and show both dominant antiferromagnetic and weak ferromagnetic behavior.
The present study aims at the integration of the oxalic conversion route into green chemistry for the synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles (CuO-NPs) with controllable structural, morphological, and magnetic properties. Two oxalate-containing precursors (H2C2O4.2H(2)O and (NH4)(2)C2O4.H2O) and different volume ratios of a mixed water/glycerol solvent were tested. First, the copper oxalates were synthesized and then subjected to thermal decomposition in air at 400 degrees C to produce the CuO powders. The purity of the samples was confirmed by X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD), and the crystallite sizes were calculated using the Scherrer method. The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images revealed oval-shaped CuO-NPs, and the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed that morphological features of copper oxalate precursors and their corresponding oxides were affected by the glycerol (V/V) ratio as well as the type of C2O42- starting material. The magnetic properties of CuO-NPs were determined by measuring the temperature-dependent magnetization and the hysteresis curves at 5 and 300 K. The obtained results indicate the simultaneous coexistence of dominant antiferromagnetic and weak ferromagnetic behavior.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据