4.6 Article

Interfacial Modification and Bending Performance of 3D Orthogonal Woven Composites with Basalt Filament Yarns

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 16, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma16114015

关键词

3D woven composites; basalt filament yarns; surface modification; mechanical properties; finite element simulation; damage mechanism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To improve the interfacial properties, 3D orthogonal woven fabrics made of basalt filament yarns were modified with carboxylated carbon nanotubes (KH570-MWCNTs) and polydopamine (PDA). The modified fabrics showed enhanced bending properties, with maximum bending loads increased by 31.5% and 31.0%. Finite element analysis and experimental testing confirmed the accuracy of the simulation results, demonstrating the material's damage situation and mechanism during the bending process.
To improve their interfacial properties, 3D orthogonal woven fabrics with basalt filament yarns were modified with functionalized carboxylated carbon nanotubes (KH570-MWCNTs) and polydopamine (PDA). Fourier infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) analysis and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) testing were used. It was demonstrated that both methods could successfully modify basalt fiber (BF) 3D woven fabrics. The 3D orthogonal woven composites (3DOWC) were produced with epoxy resin and 3D orthogonal woven fabrics as raw material by the VARTM molding process. The bending properties of the 3DOWC were tested and analyzed by experimental and finite element analysis methods. The results showed that the bending properties of the 3DOWC modified by KH570-MWCNTs and PDA were significantly improved, and the maximum bending loads were increased by 31.5% and 31.0%. The findings of the finite element simulation and the experiment results were in good agreement, and the simulation error value was 3.37%. The correctness of the finite element simulation results and the model's validity further reveal the material's damage situation and damage mechanism in the bending process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据