4.6 Article

Band Gaps and Optical Properties of RENiO3 upon Strain: Combining First-Principles Calculations and Machine Learning

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 16, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma16083070

关键词

rare earth nickelates; epitaxial strain; machine learning; first-principles calculations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The electronic and optical properties of RENiO3 under strain were studied using first-principles calculations. Tensile strength widens the band gap, while compressive strain increases light absorption. Machine learning algorithms revealed the key factors affecting band gaps and optical properties.
Rare earth nickel-based perovskite oxides (RENiO3) have been widely studied over recent decades because of their unique properties. In the synthesis of RENiO3 thin films, a lattice mismatch frequently exists between the substrates and the thin films, which may affect the optical properties of RENiO3. In this paper, the first-principles calculations were employed to study the electronic and optical properties of RENiO3 under strain. The results showed that with the increase in tensile strength, the band gap generally shows a widening trend. For optical properties, the absorption coefficients increase with the enhancement of photon energies in the far-infrared range. The compressive strain increases the light absorption, while the tensile strain suppresses it. For the reflectivity spectrum in the far-infrared range, a minimum reflectivity displays around the photon energy of 0.3 eV. The tensile strain enhances the reflectivity in the range of 0.05-0.3 eV, whereas it decreases it when the photon energies are larger than 0.3 eV. Furthermore, machine learning algorithms were applied and found that the planar epitaxial strain, electronegativity, volume of supercells, and rare earth element ion radius play key roles in the band gaps. Photon energy, electronegativity, band gap, the ionic radius of the rare earth element, and the tolerance factor are key parameters significantly influencing the optical properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据