4.6 Article

Structure and Wear Performance of a Titanium Alloy by Using Low-Temperature Plasma Oxy-Nitriding

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 16, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma16103609

关键词

plasma oxy-nitriding; titanium alloy; low-temperature; thick coating

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a low-temperature plasma oxy-nitriding technology with two-stage processes was developed to address the issues of high nitriding temperature and long nitriding time in conventional plasma nitriding technologies. Compared to conventional plasma nitriding technology, this new technology can achieve a thicker permeation coating. This is because the oxygen introduction in the first two-hour oxy-nitriding step can break the continuous TiN layer, facilitating the diffusion of O and N into the titanium alloy and forming an inter-connected porous structure under a compact compound layer.
To solve the problems of high nitriding temperature and long nitriding time with conventional plasma nitriding technologies, a kind of low-temperature plasma oxy-nitriding technology containing two-stage processes with different ratios of N to O was developed on a TC4 alloy in this paper. A thicker permeation coating can be obtained with this new technology compared to conventional plasma nitriding technology. The reason for this is that the oxygen introduction in the first two-hour oxy-nitriding step can break the continuous TiN layer, which facilitates the quick and deep diffusion of the solution-strengthening elements of O and N into the titanium alloy. Moreover, an inter-connected porous structure was formed under a compact compound layer, which acts as a buffer layer to absorb the external wear force. Therefore, the resultant coating showed the lowest COF values during the initial wear state, and almost no debris and cracks were detected after the wear test. For the treated samples with low hardness and no porous structure, fatigue cracks can easily form on the surface, and bulk peeling-offcan occur during the wear course.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据