4.0 Article

Validity of self-reported oral conditions among Brazilian older women: Do socio-economic factors matter?

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/idh.12680

关键词

concordance; cross-sectional studies; dental prosthesis; self-report; socio-economic factors; tooth loss

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to validate the agreement between self-report and clinical examination of oral conditions and evaluate the influence of sociodemographic factors on the accuracy of self-reporting among women aged 60 and older. Results showed high levels of agreement in the self-reporting of edentulism and the use of dental prostheses among older women. However, there were differences observed, particularly among women with lower income and education levels.
Objective To validate the level of agreement between self-report and clinical examination for oral conditions and evaluate the effect of sociodemographic conditions on the validity of self-report among women aged 60 and older.Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in a social community center for seniors in Southern Brazil. Sociodemographic data (age, level of education, and income) were measured. Participants were interviewed and clinically examined for the number of teeth (DMF-T index) and the use of dental prostheses. The self-reported number of teeth in each arch and the use of dental prostheses were gathered through interviews. The level of agreement was estimated using the observed agreement, Kappa statistics, sensitivity/specificity (edentulism/prostheses) and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient, and related tests (number of teeth). The validity of the oral conditions was estimated according to sociodemographic information.Results Ninety-nine women participated in the study. High levels of agreement were observed for edentulism (97.8%; 95%CI 92.8;99.7; Kappa 0.947) and the use of dental prostheses (97.0%; 95%CI 91.3;99.4; Kappa 0.922). In both conditions, despite achieving similar concordance correlation coefficients (ranging from weak to moderate), the mean number of upper teeth was lower in clinical examination (7.1 +/- 5.2) compared with self-reported (8.6 +/- 3.6), while the opposite was observed for lower teeth (clinical examination: 9.1 +/- 3.4; self-reported: 6.6 +/- 5.3). Larger differences were found among women of low income and educational levels.Conclusions Our findings suggest that the participants' socio-economic position might influence their self-reported number of teeth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据