4.7 Article

Dimeric p53 Mutant Elicits Unique Tumor-Suppressive Activities through an Altered Metabolic Program

期刊

CANCER DISCOVERY
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 1230-1249

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-22-0872

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cancer-related alterations of the p53 tetramerization domain (TD) result in monomeric or dimeric p53 states. Monomers are inactive forms of p53, while dimers confer some tumor-suppressive activities through the upregulation of the PPAR pathway. These activities are associated with lower prevalence of thymic lymphomas and increased CD8+ T-cell differentiation.
Cancer-related alterations of the p53 tetramerization domain (TD) abrogate wild -type (WT) p53 function. They result in a protein that preferentially forms monomers or dimers, which are also normal p53 states under basal cellular conditions. However, their physiologic relevance is not well understood. We have established in vivo models for monomeric and dimeric p53, which model Li-Fraumeni syndrome patients with germline p53 TD alterations. p53 monomers are inactive forms of the protein. Unexpectedly, p53 dimers conferred some tumor suppression that is not mediated by canonical WT p53 activities. p53 dimers upregulate the PPAR pathway. These activities are associated with lower prevalence of thymic lymphomas and increased CD8+T-cell differentiation. Lymphomas derived from dimeric p53 mice show cooperating alterations in the PPAR pathway, further implicating a role for these activities in tumor suppression. Our data reveal novel functions for p53 dimers and support the exploration of PPAR agonists as therapies.SIGNIFICANCE: New mouse models with TP53R342P (monomer) or TP53A347D (dimer) mutations mimic Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Although p53 monomers lack function, p53 dimers conferred noncanonical tumor-suppressive activities. We describe novel activities for p53 dimers facilitated by PPARs and propose these are basal p53 activities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据