4.3 Article

Analysis of the magneto-thermoelastic vibrations of rotating Euler-Bernoulli nanobeams using the nonlocal elasticity model

期刊

BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS
卷 2023, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/s13661-023-01706-5

关键词

Rotating nanobeams; Thermoelasticity DPL model; Electrical source; Graphene tape

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces the size-dependent modeling and investigation of the transverse vibrational behavior of rotating thermoelastic nanobeams using nonlocal elasticity theory. A model of thermal conductivity with two-phase delays (DPL) is utilized, taking into account microstructural influences. The state-space approach and Laplace transform approach are employed to solve the governing equations developed in the context of the nonlocal Eringen model. It is revealed how coefficients such as rotational angular velocity, nonlocal coefficient, voltage, electrical resistance, and applied magnetic field influence the behavior of the nanobeam.
This paper introduces size-dependent modeling and investigation of the transverse vibrational behavior of rotating thermoelastic nanobeams by means of nonlocal elasticity theory. In the formulation, a model of thermal conductivity with two-phase delays (DPL) was utilized. By incorporating the interactions between phonons and electrons, this model took into account microstructural influences. Also, we have employed the state-space approach and Laplace transform approach to solve the governing equations, which were developed in the context of the nonlocal Eringen model. The nanobeam material is subjected to a changeable temperature field produced by the graphene tape attached to the nanobeam and connected to an electrical source. In addition, the nanobeam material is fully encompassed by an axially applied magnetic field. It has been revealed how coefficients such as the rotational angular velocity of the nanobeam, nonlocal coefficient, voltage, electrical resistance, and applied magnetic field influence its behavior.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据