4.7 Review

Megalin and cubilin in proximal tubule protein reabsorption: from experimental models to human disease

期刊

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
卷 89, 期 1, 页码 58-67

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2015.11.007

关键词

albuminuria; endocytosis; Fanconi syndrome; proximal tubule

资金

  1. Danish Medical Research Council
  2. Lundbeck Foundation
  3. Novo Nordic Foundation
  4. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF14OC0011751, NNF13OC0006727] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Proximal tubule protein uptake is mediated by 2 receptors, megalin and cubilin. These receptors rescue a variety of filtered ligands, including biomarkers, essential vitamins, and hormones. Receptor gene knockout animal models have identified important functions of the receptors and have established their essential role in modulating urinary protein excretion. Rare genetic syndromes associated with dysfunction of these receptors have been identified and characterized, providing additional information on the importance of these receptors in humans. Using various disease models in combination with receptor gene knockout, the implications of receptor dysfunction in acute and chronic kidney injury have been explored and have pointed to potential new roles of these receptors. Based on data from animal models, this paper will review current knowledge on proximal tubule endocytic receptor function and regulation, and their role in renal development, protein reabsorption, albumin uptake, and normal renal physiology. These findings have implications for the pathophysiology and diagnosis of proteinuric renal diseases. We will examine the limitations of the different models and compare the findings to phenotypic observations in inherited human disorders associated with receptor dysfunction. Furthermore, evidence from receptor knockout mouse models as well as human observations suggesting a role of protein receptors for renal disease will be discussed in light of conditions such as chronic kidney disease, diabetes, and hypertension.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据