4.3 Article

The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) positively correlates with the presence and severity of metabolic syndrome in obese adults, but not in obese children/adolescents

期刊

BMC ENDOCRINE DISORDERS
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12902-023-01369-4

关键词

Obesity; Metabolic syndrome; Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; Adults; Children; adolescents

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates the usefulness of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in evaluating metabolic syndrome (MetS) in obese individuals. The prevalence of MetS is higher in adults compared to children/adolescents, and NLR values are positively correlated with MetS severity in adults but not in pediatric subjects.
Metabolic syndrome (MetS) associated with obesity is a pathological condition increasing worldwide. Recent studies have demonstrated that the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) can be successfully used to stage MetS in obese adults. The aim of the study was to evaluate NLR values in 552 children/adolescents (M 219, F 333; 14.8 [12.9-16.3] years) and 231 adults (M 88, F 143; 52.3 [36.4-63.3] years) with morbid obesity, subdivided into subgroups according with the presence or absence of MetS. Adult patients with obesity showed a higher prevalence of MetS compared to the pediatric population (71% vs 26%), associated with a greater number of subjects with 3 and 4-5 altered components for MetS. NLR was higher (P-value = 0.041) in adults with MetS compared with those without. NLR values also positively correlated with the severity grade of the syndrome (P-value = 0.032). By contrast, in pediatric subjects with obesity with MetS, NLR values were comparable with those recorded in subjects without MetS (P-value = 0.861), no correlation being found with MetS severity (P-value = 0.441). Our study confirms the importance of NLR as an inflammatory indicator associated with MetS in adult subjects with severe obesity, while it excludes a similar role in children/adolescents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据