4.6 Article

Two-dimensional peripheral refraction in adults

期刊

BIOMEDICAL OPTICS EXPRESS
卷 14, 期 5, 页码 2375-2385

出版社

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/BOE.488098

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to establish a database of two-dimensional (2D) peripheral refraction profiles in adults and explore the features for different central refraction values. The results showed that there were differences in peripheral refraction among different groups with myopia/ slight myopia/ hyperopia, and the defocus deviations varied in different regions with central refraction. The defocus asymmetry between the upper and lower retinas within 16 degrees increased with the increase of central myopia. These results provide rich information for possible individual corrections and lens design by characterizing the variation of peripheral defocus with central myopia.
Peripheral refraction has been studied for decades; however, its detection and description are somehow simplistic and limited. Therefore, their role in visual function and refractive correction, as well as myopia control, is not completely understood. This study aims to establish a database of two-dimensional (2D) peripheral refraction profiles in adults and explore the features for different central refraction values. A group of 479 adult subjects were recruited. Using an open-view Hartmann-Shack scanning wavefront sensor, their right naked eyes were measured. The overall features of the relative peripheral refraction maps showed myopic defocus, slight myopic defocus, and hyperopic defocus in the hyperopic and emmetropic groups, in the mild myopic group, and in other myopic groups, respectively. Defocus deviations with central refraction vary in different regions. The defocus asymmetry between the upper and lower retinas within 16 degrees increased with the increase of central myopia. By characterizing the variation of peripheral defocus with central myopia, these results provide rich information for possible individual corrections and lens design.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据