4.6 Review

Catalytic reduction of NOx and oxidation of dichloroethane over a-MnO2 catalysts: Properties-Reactivity relationship

期刊

ARABIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 16, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2023.104587

关键词

a-MnO2; NOx reduction; DCE oxidation; Properties-reactivity relationship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The reduction ability of NO by γ-MnO2 catalysts and the oxidation performance of 1,2-dichloroethane were investigated. The results showed that γ-MnO2-3 exhibited the highest catalytic activity with 63.5% conversion of NOx at 250°C and 80% conversion of DCE at 338°C. The active phase of γ-MnO2-3 was tetragonal γ-MnO2 with the selectively exposed plane of (211), and it had more low valence Mn active sites, higher surface adsorbed oxygen (Oads) /lattice oxygen (Olatt) ratio, and lower reduction temperature in H2-TPR profiles compared to other catalysts.
The reduction ability of NO to N2 and the oxidation performance of 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE) over a-MnO2 catalysts were investigated. The results show that a-MnO2-3 exhibited the highest catalytic activity in 63.5 % conversion of NOx reduction by C3H8 at 250 degrees C, and 80 % con-version of DCE combustion by O2 at 338 degrees C. It is revealed the active phase of a-MnO2-3 is tetrag-onal a-MnO2 with the selectively exposed plane of (211). It was proposed the high DCE decomposition of a-MnO2-3 was ascribed to the redox properties. The overall characterization results revealed that a-MnO2-3 catalyst preserves more active sites of low valence Mn and higher surface adsorbed oxygen (Oads) /lattice oxygen (Olatt) at the outermost layers, and lower reduction temperature in H2-TPR profiles than that of other catalysts. Meanwhile, NH3-TPD profile of a-MnO2-3 also shows a large number of acid sites promote NOx reduction.(c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据