4.3 Article

The ice dynamic and melting response of Pine Island Ice Shelf to calving

期刊

ANNALS OF GLACIOLOGY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/aog.2023.24

关键词

Calving; ice/ocean interactions; ice shelves; ice-sheet modelling; polar and subpolar oceans

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sea level rise from Pine Island Glacier is influenced by the backstress from its floating extension, the Pine Island Ice Shelf. The retreat of the ice shelf front and subsequent calving may lead to increased ocean melting and thinning of the ice shelf, with potentially detrimental consequences for stability.
Sea level rise contributions from the Pine Island Glacier (PIG) are strongly modulated by the backstress that its floating extension - Pine Island Ice Shelf (PIIS) - exerts on the adjoining grounded ice. The front of PIIS has recently retreated significantly via calving, and satellite and theoretical analyses have suggested further retreat is inevitable. As well as inducing an instantaneous increase in ice flow, retreat of the PIIS front may result in increased ocean melting, by relaxing the topographic barrier to warm ocean water that is currently provided by a prominent seabed ridge. Recently published research (Bradley and others, 2022a) has shown that PIIS may exhibit a strong melting response to calving, with melting close to the PIG grounding line always increasing with ice front retreat. Here, we summarise this research and, additionally, place the results in a glaciological context by comparing the impact of melt-induced and ice-dynamical changes in the ice shelf thinning rate. We find that while PIG is expected to experience rapid acceleration in response to further ice front retreat, the mean instantaneous thinning response is set primarily by changes in melting, rather than ice dynamics. Overall, further ice front retreat is expected to lead to enhanced ice-shelf thinning, with potentially detrimental consequences for ice shelf stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据