4.8 Review

Trends and Prospects of Bulk and Single-Atom Catalysts for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 13, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202203913

关键词

electrocatalysts; hydrogen; OER; single atom

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrolytic hydrogen is crucial for producing green fuels and chemicals and maintaining energy balance in the future electricity grid. However, the sluggish kinetics of the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) impede its efficiency. Extensive research is being conducted to develop advanced OER electrocatalysts, including bulk and single-atom electrocatalysts (SACs).
Electrolytic hydrogen is expected to play a key role in the production of green fuels and chemicals, while contributing to balancing consumption and supply in the future electricity grid relying largely on intermittent renewable sources for energy production. However, the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) is a major bottleneck in boosting conversion efficiency due to the sluggish kinetics of the four-electron transfer process. Intensive research efforts are thus directed toward the development of advanced OER electrocatalysts. This review aims at bringing together recent advances in bulk and single-atom electrocatalysts (SACs) for the OER. Starting from the established understanding of the OER mechanism, it offers an overview of state-of-the-art materials for the OER, highlighting the current research directions and shortcomings of bulk electrocatalysts. The final part addresses the novel development of SACs, covering their OER performance as well as the established synthetic routes and advances in characterization techniques that shine light on the geometric and electronic configuration of SACs. The review of experimental findings is complimented with theoretical insights from density functional theory (DFT). The article concludes with a summary along with future opportunities to further improve the activity of SACs for the OER.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据