4.7 Review

Challenges and opportunities for stem cell therapy in patients with chronic kidney disease

期刊

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
卷 89, 期 4, 页码 767-778

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2015.11.023

关键词

end-stage renal disease; senescence; stem cells; uremia

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [DK73608, HL123160, DK102325, DK106427]
  2. Mayo Clinic Center for Regenerative Medicine
  3. Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery
  4. Satellite Healthcare

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a global health care burden affecting billions of individuals worldwide. The kidney has limited regenerative capacity from chronic insults, and for the most common causes of CKD, no effective treatment exists to prevent progression to end-stage kidney failure. Therefore, novel interventions, such as regenerative cell-based therapies, need to be developed for CKD. Given the risk of allosensitization, autologous transplantation of cells to boost regenerative potential is preferred. Therefore, verification of cell function and vitality in CKD patients is imperative. Two cell types have been most commonly applied in regenerative medicine. Endothelial progenitor cells contribute to neovasculogenesis primarily through paracrine angiogenic activity and partly by differentiation into mature endothelial cells in situ. Mesenchymal stem cells also exert paracrine effects, including proangiogenic, anti-inflammatory, and antifibrotic activity. However, in CKD, multiple factors may contribute to reduced cell function, including older age, coexisting cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic inflammatory states, and uremia, which may limit the effectiveness of an autologous cell-based therapy approach. This Review highlights current knowledge on stem and progenitor cell function and vitality, aspects of the uremic milieu that may serve as a barrier to therapy, and novel methods to improve stem cell function for potential transplantation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据