4.8 Article

Stabilizing Oxidation State of SnO2 for Highly Selective CO2 Electroreduction to Formate at Large Current Densities

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 3101-3108

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.3c00123

关键词

oxidation state of SnO2; atom doping; oxygen vacancy; electrocatalytic CO2 reduction; large current density; formate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By introducing atomic doping of Cu, Bi, or Pt, oxygen vacancies are generated in the SnO2 lattice, which stabilizes the oxidation state of SnO2 during CO2RR. This strategy enables a high formate Faradic efficiency (>80%) and a cell energy efficiency of 50-60% at industrial-level current densities, outperforming previous studies.
Even though electrocatalytic CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR) to formate has made significant advances, achieving a high cell energy efficiency at industrial-level current densities is still a bottleneck for the large-scale application of this technology. SnO2 is a promising electrocatalyst for formate production but is restricted by the unstable oxidation state under high reduction potentials, causing catalyst reconstruction and inactivation. Herein, we present an atomic doping strategy (by Cu, Bi, or Pt) to trigger the emergence of oxygen vacancy in the SnO2 lattice and stabilize the oxidation state of SnO2 during CO2RR. As a result, the optimal Cu-incorporated SnO2 can keep a high formate Faradic efficiency of >80% and a cell energy efficiency of about 50-60% at a wide range of current densities up to 500 mA cm-2 in a commercial flow cell, surpassing most reported works. A set of in situ spectroscopy measurements and controlled electrochemical tests suggest that the oxygen vacancy, induced by the participation of Cu/Bi/Pt single atoms, holds the key to stabilizing SnO2 as well as promoting the adsorption of formate-related *OCHO reaction intermediate. A qualitative relationship between the oxygen vacancy concentration and CO2-to-formate conversion is constructed on a series of doped SnO2 catalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据