4.8 Article

Heteronuclear Dual Single-Atom Catalysts for Ambient Conversion of CO2 from Air to Formate

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 3915-3924

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.2c06033

关键词

single-atom catalysts; CO2 hydrogenation; CO2 capture; formate; ambient conditions; synergistic effect

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, heteronuclear dual single atom catalysts (SACs) composed of Pd and 3d transition metals supported by covalent triazine frameworks (CTFs) were proposed. The optimized Pd1-Co1/CTF catalyst exhibited high conversion of captured CO2 into formate. The heteronuclear Pd and Co metal atoms acted as active sites for H2 activation and CO2 adsorption, respectively, showing enhanced activity for formate synthesis with synergistic effect.
Single-atom catalysts (SACs) can achieve the maximum metal atom utilization, which exhibit great potential for the chemical transformation of CO2. However, an isolated single active site is less satisfactory for catalyzing multiple molecule reactions involving CO2 hydrogenation. In this work, we propose heteronuclear dual SACs composed of Pd and 3d transition metals supported by covalent triazine frameworks (CTFs). Among these catalysts, the optimized Pd1-Co1/CTF catalyst exhibits up to 84.6% conversion of the captured CO2 from air into formate at 30 degrees C and 1 bar. The in situ DRIFT characterization and density functional theory calculations reveal that CO2 in air is captured by the Et3N solution as bicarbonate, which is then hydrogenated into formate via the Pd1-Co1 heteronuclear dual single atom with an energy barrier as low as 17.2 kcal/mol. The heteronuclear Pd and Co metal atoms act as the active site for H2 activation and CO2 adsorption, respectively, thus exhibiting enhanced activity for formate synthesis with a synergistic effect. These findings present an insight into the synthesis and application of heteronuclear dual SACs and pave an avenue for conversion of CO2 in the air by heterogeneous catalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据