4.8 Article

Non-monotonic changes in Asian Water Towers' streamflow at increasing warming levels

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-36804-6

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found non-monotonic changes in river flows for seven major rivers originating from the Tibetan Plateau at warming levels of 1.5 degrees C, 2.0 degrees C, and 3.0 degrees C. River flows decreased by 0.1-3.2% at 1.5 degrees C warming level and increased by 1.5-12% at 3.0 degrees C warming level. The variations in river flows were influenced by rainfall, snowmelt, and glacier melt. Reduced river flows threaten water security in riparian countries, while elevated flood risks are expected with further temperature increases over the Tibetan Plateau.
Previous projections show consistent increases in river flows of Asian Water Towers under future climate change. Here we find non-monotonic changes in river flows for seven major rivers originating from the Tibetan Plateau at the warming levels of 1.5 degrees C, 2.0 degrees C, and 3.0 degrees C based on an observation-constrained hydrological model. The annual mean streamflow for seven rivers at 1.5 degrees C warming level decreases by 0.1-3.2% relative to the present-day climate condition, and increases by 1.5-12% at 3.0 degrees C warming level. The shifting river flows for the Yellow, Yangtze, Brahmaputra, and Ganges are mostly influenced by projected increases in rainfall, but those for the Mekong, Salween, and Indus are dictated by the relative changes in rainfall, snowmelt and glacier melt. Reduced river flows in a moderately warmed climate threaten water security in riparian countries, while elevated flood risks are expected with further temperature increases over the Tibetan Plateau. This study discovered non-monotonic variations in river flows for seven rivers originating from the Tibetan Plateau at warming levels of 1.5 degrees C, 2.0 degrees C, and 3.0 degrees C, which then resulted in different consequences for riparian countries

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据