4.8 Article

Sema3C signaling is an alternative activator of the canonical WNT pathway in glioblastoma

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-37397-w

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Wnt pathway is frequently dysregulated in many cancers, underscoring it as a therapeutic target. Wnt inhibitors have uniformly failed in clinical trials. In this study, it is shown that Semaphorin 3C plays a role in activating the Wnt pathway through Rac1-dependent β-catenin nuclear accumulation, indicating that dual targeting of Semaphorin 3C and Wnt pathways may achieve clinically significant Wnt pathway inhibition.
The Wnt pathway is frequently dysregulated in many cancers, underscoring it as a therapeutic target. Wnt inhibitors have uniformly failed in clinical trials. Here, we report a mechanism of WNT pathway activation through the Semaphorin 3 C neurodevelopmental program in glioma stem-like cells. Sema3C directs & beta;-catenin nuclear accumulation in a Rac1-dependent process, leading to transactivation of Wnt target genes. Sema3C-driven Wnt signaling occurred despite suppression of Wnt ligand secretion, suggesting that Sema3C drives canonical Wnt signaling independent of Wnt ligand binding. In a mouse model of glioblastoma, combined depletion of Sema3C and & beta;-catenin partner TCF1 extended animal survival more than single target inhibition alone. In human glioblastoma, Sema3C expression and Wnt pathway activation were highly concordant. Since Sema3C is frequently overexpressed in glioblastoma, Sema3C signaling may be a significant mechanism of resistance to upstream Wnt pathway inhibitors. Dual targeting of Sema3C and Wnt pathways may achieve clinically significant Wnt pathway inhibition. Wnt signaling is dysregulated in glioblastoma (GBM). Here the authors show that Semaphorin 3C drives Wnt signaling through Rac1-dependent & beta;-catenin nuclear accumulation and that dual blockade of Semaphorin 3C and Wnt pathway reduces the growth of GBM in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据