4.8 Article

Simultaneous sulfide and methane oxidation by an extremophile

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-38699-9

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aerobic methanotrophic bacteria can survive in sulfide-rich environments, despite the inhibitory effects of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) on methane oxidation and aerobic respiration. This is due to the upregulation of a sulfide-insensitive terminal oxidase, allowing the microorganism to oxidize both methane and H2S simultaneously.
Aerobic methanotrophic bacteria oxidize methane in sulfide-rich environments, even though hydrogen sulfide (H2S) inhibits methane oxidation and aerobic respiration. Here, Schmitz et al. show that a single microorganism can oxidize methane and H2S simultaneously, and this is associated with upregulation of a sulfide-insensitive terminal oxidase. Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and methane (CH4) are produced in anoxic environments through sulfate reduction and organic matter decomposition. Both gases diffuse upwards into oxic zones where aerobic methanotrophs mitigate CH4 emissions by oxidizing this potent greenhouse gas. Although methanotrophs in myriad environments encounter toxic H2S, it is virtually unknown how they are affected. Here, through extensive chemostat culturing we show that a single microorganism can oxidize CH4 and H2S simultaneously at equally high rates. By oxidizing H2S to elemental sulfur, the thermoacidophilic methanotroph Methylacidiphilum fumariolicum SolV alleviates the inhibitory effects of H2S on methanotrophy. Strain SolV adapts to increasing H2S by expressing a sulfide-insensitive ba(3)-type terminal oxidase and grows as chemolithoautotroph using H2S as sole energy source. Genomic surveys revealed putative sulfide-oxidizing enzymes in numerous methanotrophs, suggesting that H2S oxidation is much more widespread in methanotrophs than previously assumed, enabling them to connect carbon and sulfur cycles in novel ways.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据