4.8 Article

Multiplexed analysis of EV reveals specific biomarker composition with diagnostic impact

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-36932-z

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed a technique called MASEV for multiplexed analysis of EVs, which allows the interrogation of thousands of individual EVs using multi-channel fluorescence staining. The findings reveal the presence of multiple biomarkers in single vesicles and the potential loss of rare EV subtypes through affinity purification. These findings demonstrate the importance of MASEV in uncovering the heterogeneity and biology of EVs and improving diagnostic specificity.
Exosomes and extracellular vesicles (EV) are increasingly being explored as circulating biomarkers, but their heterogenous composition will likely mandate the development of multiplexed EV technologies. Iteratively multiplexed analyses of near single EVs have been challenging to implement beyond a few colors during spectral sensing. Here we developed a multiplexed analysis of EV technique (MASEV) to interrogate thousands of individual EVs during 5 cycles of multi-channel fluorescence staining for 15 EV biomarkers. Contrary to the common belief, we show that: several markers proposed to be ubiquitous are less prevalent than believed; multiple biomarkers concur in single vesicles but only in small fractions; affinity purification can lead to loss of rare EV subtypes; and deep profiling allows detailed analysis of EV, potentially improving the diagnostic content. These findings establish the potential of MASEV for uncovering fundamental EV biology and heterogeneity and increasing diagnostic specificity. Multiplexed analyses of near single EVs is currently challenging. Here the authors report the method MASEV, multiplexed analysis of EVs, to interrogate thousands of individual EVs during 5 cycles of multi-channel fluorescence staining for 15 EV biomarkers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据