4.5 Review

Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomal Noncoding RNAs as Alternative Treatments for Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: Current Status and Future Perspectives

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12265-023-10401-w

关键词

Mesenchymal stem cells; Exosomes; Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury; Oxidative stress; Inflammation; Regulated cell death; ncRNAs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ischemic cardiomyopathy is treated mainly with thrombolytic drugs, percutaneous coronary intervention, and coronary artery bypass grafting. Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (MIRI) is a complication of obstructive revascularization with limited therapeutic options. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes (MSC-EXOs) can alleviate MIRI and prevent limitations caused by direct MSC administration. Using MSC-EXOs instead of MSCs is a potentially beneficial cell-free treatment strategy for MIRI.
Ischemic cardiomyopathy is treated mainly with thrombolytic drugs, percutaneous coronary intervention, and coronary artery bypass grafting to recanalize blocked vessels. Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (MIRI) is an unavoidable complication of obstructive revascularization. Compared with those of myocardial ischemic injury, few effective therapeutic options are available for MIRI treatment. The pathophysiological mechanisms of MIRI involve the inflammatory response, the immune response, oxidative stress, apoptosis, intracellular Ca2+ overload, and cardiomyocyte energy metabolism. These mechanisms exacerbate MIRI. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes (MSC-EXOs) can alleviate MIRI through these mechanisms and, to some extent, prevent the limitations caused by direct MSC administration. Therefore, using MSC-EXOs instead of MSCs to treat MIRI is a potentially beneficial cell-free treatment strategy. In this review, we describe the mechanism of action of MSC-EXO-derived noncoding RNAs in the treatment of MIRI and discuss the advantages and limitations of this strategy, as well as possible future research directions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据