4.6 Review

The role of epigenetic modifications in sensory hair cell development, survival, and regulation

期刊

FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR NEUROSCIENCE
卷 17, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2023.1210279

关键词

epigenetic regulation; inner ear; sensory hair cell; hair cell protection; hair cell regeneration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cochlea is the sensory organ in the periphery, and hair cells are its main sensory cells. Epigenetic regulation controls the structure and function of the genome in response to different cell fates during the development and survival of hair cells. Epigenetic modification also plays a significant role in the regulation of hair cell fate in response to environmental-related damage. Understanding the role of epigenetics in inner ear cell development, survival, and regeneration is crucial for hearing protection.
The cochlea is the sensory organ in the periphery, and hair cells are its main sensory cells. The development and survival of hair cells are highly controlled processes. When cells face intracellular and environmental stimuli, epigenetic regulation controls the structure and function of the genome in response to different cell fates. During sensory hair cell development, different histone modifications can induce normal numbers of functional hair cells to generate. When individuals are exposed to environmental-related hair cell damage, epigenetic modification also plays a significant role in the regulation of hair cell fate. Since mammalian hair cells cannot regenerate, their loss can cause permanent sensorineural hearing loss. Many breakthroughs have been achieved in recent years in understanding the signaling pathways that determine hair cell regeneration, and it is fascinating to note that epigenetic regulation plays a significant role in hair cell regeneration. In this review, we discuss the role of epigenetics in inner ear cell development, survival and regeneration and the significant impact on hearing protection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据