4.5 Article

FFR-SSD: feature fusion and reconstruction single shot detector for multi-scale object detection

期刊

SIGNAL IMAGE AND VIDEO PROCESSING
卷 17, 期 6, 页码 3145-3153

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s11760-023-02536-9

关键词

Computer vision; Deep learning; Convolutional neural network; Object detection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a hierarchical feature fusion and reconstruction method called FFR-SSD is proposed to address the challenge of detecting small and multi-scale objects. By incorporating a multi-scale visual attention model, a hierarchical feature map weighing mechanism, and an effective feature map reconstruction module, the proposed method achieves significant improvements in object detection performance.
Object detection is one of the most fundamental tasks toward image content understanding. Although numerous algorithms have been proposed, implementing effective and efficient object detection is still very challenging for now. To solve the challenges of small and multi-scale objects, we propose a hierarchical feature fusion and reconstruction method called feature fusion and reconstruction single shot detector (FFR-SSD). We first present a multi-scale visual attention model, which incorporates the channel-wise and space-wise information into the multi-branch feature enhancement module to improve the feature representation capacities. Second, a hierarchical feature map weighing mechanism is developed to fuse multi-layer feature maps, which contributes to describing the intact objects for the subsequent module. Third, we present an effective feature map reconstruction module to encourage the model to focus on pivotal information. Therefore, the overall contour information is preserved for the shallow enhanced response map and the semantic feature information is enriched for the deep enhanced feature map. Numerous experiments on two public benchmark datasets show that the proposed method achieves significant improvements over the state of the arts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据