4.7 Article

Coacervation-triggered hierarchically assembled hydrogels with application as surgical sealant

期刊

BIOFABRICATION
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/acdc55

关键词

coacervation; molecular modeling; hierarchical assembly; polyphenol chemistry; surgical sealant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adhesive hydrogels with rapid and controllable properties have been developed using polyphenol chemistry. These hydrogels show excellent mechanical and adhesion performance on wet and dynamic biological tissues. The results demonstrate the promising potential of these hydrogels as surgical sealants.
Adhesive hydrogels possess great potential to be explored as tissue adhesives, surgical sealants, and hemostats. However, it has been a great challenge to develop hydrogels that can function rapidly and controllably on wet, dynamic biological tissues. Inspired by polyphenol chemistry, we introduce a coacervation-triggered shaping strategy that enables the hierarchical assembly of recombinant human collagen (RHC) and tannic acid (TA). The conformation of the RHC and TA aggregates is controlled to evolve from granular to web-like states, accompanied by the significant enhancement of mechanical and adhesion performance. The coacervation and assembly process is driven by intermolecular interactions, especially hydrogen bonding between RHC and TA. Benefitting from the multifaceted nature of polyphenol chemistry, the hierarchically assembled hydrogels revealed excellent properties as surgical sealing materials, including fast gelation time (within 10 s), clotting time (within 60 s), ultrastretchability (strain >10 000%), and tough adhesion (adhesive strength >250 kPa). In vivo experiments demonstrated complete sealing of severely leaking heart and liver tissues with the assistance of in situ formed hydrogels during 7 d of follow-up. This work presents a highly promising hydrogel-based surgical sealant in wet and dynamic biological environments for future biomedical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据