4.6 Review

Elucidating the Implications of Norovirus N- and O-Glycosylation, O-GlcNAcylation, and Phosphorylation

期刊

VIRUSES-BASEL
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v15030798

关键词

norovirus; N- and O-glycosylation; O-GlcNAcylation; phosphorylation

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Norovirus is the leading cause of foodborne gastroenteritis, impacting millions of people worldwide annually. Different genotypes of norovirus exhibit post-translational modifications (PTMs) in their viral antigens, such as glycosylation and phosphorylation, which are associated with viral replication and virulence. Recent advancements in mass spectrometry have led to the discovery of more PTMs, contributing significantly to the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases. However, the mechanisms by which PTMs affect noroviruses are still not well understood. This section reviews the current knowledge on PTMs in noroviruses and their impact on pathogenesis, as well as the strategies and techniques for their identification.
Norovirus is the most common cause of foodborne gastroenteritis, affecting millions of people worldwide annually. Among the ten genotypes (GI-GX) of norovirus, only GI, GII, GIV, GVIII, and GIX infect humans. Some genotypes reportedly exhibit post-translational modifications (PTMs), including N- and O-glycosylation, O-GlcNAcylation, and phosphorylation, in their viral antigens. PTMs have been linked to increased viral genome replication, viral particle release, and virulence. Owing to breakthroughs in mass spectrometry (MS) technologies, more PTMs have been discovered in recent years and have contributed significantly to preventing and treating infectious diseases. However, the mechanisms by which PTMs act on noroviruses remain poorly understood. In this section, we outline the current knowledge of the three common types of PTM and investigate their impact on norovirus pathogenesis. Moreover, we summarize the strategies and techniques for the identification of PTMs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据