4.1 Article

A novel approach toward the generation of oocytes by direct diploid cell haploidization

期刊

ZYGOTE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0967199423000096

关键词

Artificial oocytes; Meiosis; Somatic cell haploidization; Somatic cell nuclear transfer; Time-lapse microscopy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oocyte-mediated somatic cell haploidization is a feasible technique for creating functional gametes in mammals. Experimental data have shown successful reconstruction of murine oocytes, resulting in a blastocyst formation rate of 12.7% and a diploid embryo rate of 27.3%. This method has the potential to generate patient-genotyped oocytes, but further research is needed to improve the generation of chromosomally normal embryos.
Oocyte-mediated somatic cell haploidization is a process in which a diploid cell halves its chromosomal content by segregating its homologue within the ooplasm. Replacing the donor oocyte nucleus with a patient's female diploid somatic nucleus can generate patient-genotyped oocytes. Insemination of these resulting constructs enables their activation and induces a reductive meiotic division, haploidizing the diploid female donor cell that can subsequently support syngamy with the male genome and create a zygote. So far, experimental data for this method have been limited and have not consistently proven the generation of chromosomally normal embryos. Overall, we achieved reconstruction of murine oocytes with a micromanipulation survival rate of 56.5%, and a correct haploidization and fertilization rate of 31.2%, resulting in a 12.7% blastocyst rate. Time-lapse analysis revealed that reconstructed embryos underwent a timely polar body extrusion and pronuclear appearance followed by a satisfactory embryonic cleavage, comparable with the control. Whole genome sequencing of the analyzed embryos indicated that 27.3% (6/22) were properly diploid. Our findings suggest that diploid cell haploidization may be a feasible technique for creating functional gametes in mammals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据