4.3 Article

Morphological and ecological revision of Himantariella scutellaris Brolemann, 1926 (Chilopoda: Geophilomorpha: Himantariidae)

期刊

ZOOTAXA
卷 5278, 期 1, 页码 143-154

出版社

MAGNOLIA PRESS
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5278.1.7

关键词

Cantabric Region; ethology; habitat preferences; intraspecific variability; monticolous; Prelitoral Mountain Range; Pre-Pyrenees; synanthropic

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Based on new collecting data from various regions in Spain, H. scutellaris is found to have a wider distribution range in the northern Iberian Peninsula than previously believed. This study provides the first assessment of intraspecific variability, habitat preferences, and ethology of H. scutellaris. Morphological figures and identification keys are also provided, updating the diagnostic characters needed for identification. The results reveal a broader range of morphological variability and suggest monticolous, synanthropic, and nocturnal habits for the Iberian populations.
Himantariella scutellaris Brolemann, 1926 has previously been considered a French endemic species from the eastern Pyrenees. New collecting data from the Spanish Pre-Pyrenees, the Prelitoral Mountain Range and the Cantabric Region, make it possible to expand its known distribution to the northern Iberian Peninsula. Intraspecific variability, habitat preferences and ethology are assessed for the first time. New figures on the morphology of H. scutellaris and identification keys for the European Himantariidae with terminal pore-fields are provided. Results showed a wider range of morphological variability than previously reported and allowed to update the diagnostic characters needed for identification. Additionally, results showed monticolous, synanthropic and nocturnal habits for the Iberian populations and suggest that H. scutellaris is a common species at a local scale. Finally, morphology and ecology of H. scutellaris from the Iberian Peninsula and the Pyrenees are discussed in depth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据